Sep 25, 2017

Iraqi Turkmens: Kirkuk, Kurdish Referendum and Irredentist Violence


Photo courtesy of Marwan Ibrahim.

Today’s [25 September 2017] Kurdish independence referendum is highly symbolic in the history of human rights and every people’s right to self-determination. However, the disputed city of Kirkuk is currently facing violence, as its inclusion to the Kurdish territory does not meet a unanimous voice. The head of the Iraqi Turkmen Front reported that non-Kurds in Kirkuk fear for their lives, as an outbreak of sectarian violence seems to already have taken place. Division among the Turkmen community is also a contention, as the main claim in Kirkuk is over the oil fields. Overall, social cohesion in Kirkuk, which prevailed so far, is under threat as Iraqi Turkmens fear for themselves after the referendum.

 

The article below was published on The Intercept:

Across Iraqi Kurdistan, a scene is starting to become familiar: young and old alike fill the public squares and parks clad in Kurdish dress, furiously waving Kurdish flags in a rallying cry for independence.

“Long live Kurdistan!” they chant.

The iconic red, white and green Kurdish flag, with a giant sun in the middle, was first unveiled at the 1919 Paris Peace Conference, but it has never had as strong of a possibility of belonging to an actual nation until this moment. While Iraqi Kurds currently enjoy a semi-autonomous region in northern Iraq — technically governed by Iraq’s central government in Baghdad but controlled by Kurdish security forces and political parties — many have longed for an independent state after decades of oppression, suffering and political marginalization. In the wake of the Kurdish Peshmerga forces defeating Islamic State fighters in key battles in northern Iraq, including Mosul earlier this year, many Kurds hope their chance has finally arrived to gain independence — which they are voting on in a controversial referendum on Monday.

But in some regions, there are signs that the upcoming referendum could spark a violent future. Late last Monday, a group of Kurdish gunmen rode through the contested city of Kirkuk on motorcycles after a rally, opening fire on the Iraqi Turkmen Front headquarters — one of the key points of opposition to the referendum in the city. Armed guards returned the fire, killing one of the perpetrators and wounding two others.

“Right now, Arabs and Turkmen are worried for their lives,” said Ali Mahdi, a spokesman for the Iraqi Turkmen Front. Mr. Mahdi, in an interview with photographer Sebastian Meyer, on assignment for The Intercept, said he fears the referendum will disrupt the delicate economic and security relationship between the Kurdish-controlled regions of Iraq and the central government in Baghdad. Kirkuk is particularly disputed territory. It does not technically lie within the boundaries of the Kurdish-controlled region, but the Peshmerga have claimed the area since they successfully fought to secure its oil fields from the Islamic State three years ago. Many Kurds hope to fold the resource-rich city into a future Kurdistan.

However, Kirkuk’s Turkmen — and a vast majority of the Sunni and Shia’a Arab population — fear that an independent Kurdistan could further fracture Iraq, especially if it includes mixed areas like Kirkuk. While the referendum is overwhelmingly supported in Kurdish-majority provinces such as Erbil, Dohuk and Sulimaniyah, mixed areas may soon find themselves facing internal conflict, the religious and ethnic diversity they once celebrated becoming their downfall.

For instance, since last Monday’s shooting incident, Mr. Mahdi now changes his physical location every two hours, fearing Kurdish retaliation and escalating violence ahead of the vote.

“If they start shooting at us, we will start shooting at them as well,” he continues, showing how easily both sides could be triggered towards a violent scenario. “Of course we don’t want this to happen. But it’s the job of the central government to prevent this from happening.”

“I would be so happy if the referendum happens here,” Goran Gowhar, a major in the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK)-affiliated branch of the Peshmerga told Meyer from his home in Tuz, a mixed — and similarly contentious — village around fifty-five miles south of Kirkuk. Gowhar’s village has been on the frontlines of the war against ISIS, and Gowhar — and many others who have fought — hope that the Kurdish sacrifice was not in vain.

 

While the Iraqi central government has repeatedly come out against the referendum, vowing not to recognize the results and even threatening military intervention if it goes forward, this has done little to deter the Kurdish political leadership. Baghdad isn’t alone in discouraging the Kurds from holding elections. Turkey — which maintains positive relations with the Iraqi Kurdish government, led by President Masoud Barzani  — refuses to recognize the referendum, and warns that it could stoke political stability in a region that is already shouldering the presence and aftermath of the Islamic State, the war in Syria and a myriad of other tensions. The United States, which regularly champions the Kurdish forces as key allies in the fight against the Islamic State, fears that a vote for independence could pit the Peshmerga forces against the Iraqi Army, putting an end to an alliance that defeated the Islamic State in Kirkuk and Mosul in the first place.

 

While Kurds rally across the country for independence, many recognize that violence is likely—and even inevitable — especially in areas like Kirkuk and many of the surrounding smaller villages with a Kurdish presence. Violence has already broken out in Tuz, when a soldier from the Hashed al-Shaabi Shia militia lobbed a rocket towards a Kurdish neighbourhood, injuring a woman and her child in their home.

Gowhar fears this is the beginning of violence between the Shia militias and the Kurdish forces in his village.

“The only way to stop the fighting is to not go through with the referendum,” he continues. “But they want the violence — it will happen for sure.”