March 27, 2017
Photo courtesy of the BBC
In what could be an historic breakthrough for LGBT rights activists in Taiwan, a group of 14 judges in the country’s highest court will deliberate upon the constitutionality of a civil code clause that bans gay marriage. If the judiciary deems the clause unconstitutional, the parliament will be tasked with reworking these laws to ensure marriage rights for same-sex couples. Factions representing both pro-gay marriage and anti-gay marriage stances have come out in full force outside of the courts in Taipei to make their voices heard. In December 2016, President Tsai Ing-wen and the Democratic Progressive Party majority government drafted a gay marriage bill which incorporates adoption rights. If the judges deem the clause unconstitutional, Taiwan may be the first country in Asia to legalise gay marriage.
The article below was published by the BBC:
A panel of judges at Taiwan's top court are hearing a case that could make the island the first place in Asia to introduce gay marriage.
The case has been brought by a gay activist as well as municipal authorities from the capital, Taipei.
Taiwan's parliament has also been debating whether to pass laws that would allow same-sex marriage.
The movement has split society and prompted a conservative backlash, with vocal protests in recent months.
A panel of 14 justices are hearing arguments and will debate whether a line in Taiwan's civil code, which states that marriage is between a man and a woman, is unconstitutional.
Veteran gay activist Chi Chia-wei, whose attempt at registering marriage with his partner in 2013 was rejected, had petitioned for the case to be heard.
Taipei city authorities, who have been receiving requests for gay marriage, had also petitioned for clarity.
The hearing lasts only one day, but could be a decisive turning point in Taiwan's decades-long debate on whether to legalise same-sex marriage.
It's the first time the judiciary is opening the Constitutional Court on the issue. If the judges rule that Taiwan's current ban is unconstitutional, then parliament will be forced to amend the laws to offer gay couples protection.
Lawmakers, while initially supportive, have become less enthusiastic about passing such bills after vocal opposition by mainly religious groups and parents.
If the judges rule in favour of it, they will in essence be doing the dirty work for lawmakers, who can then tell their voters they have no choice but to amend the laws.
But it's still unclear how this would play out.
If same-sex marriage is approved, the LGBT community does not want a separate law to be created that only gives some protection to same-sex partners.
They want current family laws to be amended so that gay couples would be treated the same as heterosexual couples, as they would then get equal rights and treatment in all matters, including adoption of children.
Legal experts and government officials are taking part in the hearing, after which the justices will debate among themselves. The ruling is expected to come out in two months' time.
Gay rights campaigners carrying rainbow flags, turned up in front of the court in Taipei, as did anti-gay marriage protesters.
In December Taiwan's parliament approved the first draft of a bill to legalise gay marriage, with a second reading due in months.
President Tsai Ing-wen has previously said she would support marriage equality. Taiwan is known for its progressive values and energetic LGBTQ movement.
But rallies by gay rights activists in recent months have been met with protests from conservative groups and calls for the same-sex marriage bill to be struck down.