Chin: Elder Faces Two Years Imprisonment for Planting a Cross on a Hill
A Chin elder appeared in court on 28 January 2015 on what, according to the non-governmental organization Christian Solidarity Worldwide, are fabricated charges probably related to the elder’s participation in lodging a cross on a hill in Chin State. He faces a possible two year prison sentence if found guilty. The case of the elder illustrates the religious discrimination faced by Chins on a regular basis. Official permissions for the building of religious buildings and monuments are effectively impossible to obtain for Chin Christians, thereby severely limiting their right to practice their religion.
Below is an article published by Independent Catholic News:
An ethnic Chin elder is due to appear in court today, 28 January 2015, on trumped-up charges which Christian Solidarity Worldwide (CSW) believes are connected with his involvement in the planting of a cross on a hill in Hakha town, Chin State, in April 2014. The Chin State government has ordered the 54 foot-high cross, which it argues has been erected illegally to be removed on 30 January 2015.
The Chin Human Rights Organisation (CHRO) reports that the elder, Tial Cem, has been accused of cutting down pine trees without official permission, in breach of article 42 (b) of the 1992 Forest Law. To date [28 January 2015], he has reportedly been summoned to Hakha Township Court six times, and is due to appear in court again today, 28 January 2015. If found guilty, he could be sentenced to a maximum of two years in prison.
According to Tial Cem, the charges refer to land situated adjacent to where the cross has been planted and owned by JP Biak Tin Sang. An order to remove the cross, issued by the Chin State government, states that failure to dismantle and remove the cross would result in action being taken against JP Biak Tin Sang, who was also involved in planting the cross. The order stipulates that the cross must be dismantled and removed from Caarcaang Hill in Hakha by 30 January [2015] on the basis that it was constructed without permission.
Tial Cem told CHRO that they did not seek official permission for the cross as they did not believe it would be granted. Chin Christian organisations face discriminatory restrictions which make it virtually impossible to secure such official permission for religious monuments and buildings. CHRO’s 2012 report, “Threats to Our Existence: Persecution of Ethnic Chin Christians in Burma”, outlines these restrictions in detail and documents the destruction of 13 Christian crosses in Chin State, four of which were destroyed under the current government. CSW detailed violations of freedom of religion in its 2007 report, “Carrying the Cross: The military regime’s campaign of restrictions, discrimination and persecution against Christians in Burma”.
Local people in Hakha have received written permission from the Hakha Township police force to hold demonstrations protesting the government order to remove the cross on 2 and 3 February [2015]. Protest organisers have been informed by Chin State Chief Minister Hung Ngai that the cross was planted without seeking official permission from the government, and was therefore illegal, but that the matter would be discussed further at a meeting of the Chin State cabinet, which is likely to take place the week beginning 2 February [2015].
Mervyn Thomas, Chief Executive of CSW, said: “The destruction of Christian crosses in Chin State has long been a policy of the Burmese authorities, often accompanied by forcing Chin Christian villagers to build Buddhist pagodas in their place. If Burma is to proceed down a genuine path of reform, it must protect the most basic human right of freedom of religion, and allow Christians in Chin State to construct symbols of their religion in appropriate ways. The order to destroy this cross, and the prosecution of the Chin elder, illustrate once again that freedom of religion continues to be violated in Burma. We call on the authorities in Chin State to rescind the order to destroy the cross and to drop the charges against Tial Cem.”
